This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental & Energy,
Administrative/Regulatory

Feb. 23, 2021

Regulators propose major reform to Prop 65 short warnings

The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, known as OEHHA, recently proposed amending certain regulations under California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986.

Willis M. Wagner

Senior Associate
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP

Phone: (916) 534-1044

Email: will.wagner@arnoldporter.com

Arizona State Univ COL; Tempe AZ

Will focuses on consumer product defense and regulatory compliance, particularly issues involving California's Proposition 65. He is resident in the firm's San Francisco office.

Deepi K. Miller

Of Counsel
Greenberg Traurig LLP

Email: millerde@gtlaw.com

UC Hastings COL; San Francisco CA

Deepi is a regulatory attorney and business litigator who is focused on environmental and consumer safety regulations. She advises and defends local and national clients in the apparel, accessories, personal care products, food and beverage, and industrial supply industries on California consumer safety regulations, including Proposition 65 and CA Air Resources Board's Consumer Product Regulatory Program.

The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, known as OEHHA, recently proposed amending certain regulations under California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 -- more commonly known as Proposition 65. The proposed amendments would change the circumstances under which short-form warnings are available to provide safe harbor protection to companies and would create new requirements for identifying the specific chemicals at issue...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up