Technology,
Labor/Employment,
Civil Litigation
Feb. 24, 2021
Judge casts doubt on PAGA settlement: ‘an odor of mendacity’
Superior Court Judge Andrew Y.S. Cheng rejected a $4.98 million PAGA settlement agreement that e-scooter company Lime reached with one of its workers last week, writing in an order that the agreement “has an odor of mendacity about it” and represents less than 2% of the theoretical maximum recovery estimated by the worker’s own attorneys.




For at least the second time this month, a San Francisco judge cast doubt on a PAGA settlement involving worker misclassification claims, expressing concerns the agreement was reached through a reverse auction.
Superior Court Judge Andrew Y.S. Cheng rejected a $4.98 million PAGA settlement agreement that e-scooter company Lime reached with one of its workers last week...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In