This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Mar. 1, 2021

Storytelling in cross-examination

Telling effective stories is hard; telling effective stories through the mouths of unwilling and generally uncooperative witnesses is harder still. S

Chris Arledge

Partner
Ellis George Cipollone LLP

2121 Avenue of the Stars
Los Angeles , CA 90067

Email: carledge@egcfirm.com

Storytelling in cross-examination
Shutterstock

No trial lawyer would consider serving up isolated, independent facts in opening or in a direct examination. Facts are only memorable and compelling in the context of a narrative. Trial lawyers must be story tellers. Yet this emphasis on story telling often disappears on cross examination. Telling effective stories is hard; telling effective stories through the mouths of unwilling and generally uncooperative witnesses is harder still. So how do you tell effective stor...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up