This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Mar. 5, 2021

Ethics opinions offer advice; some practical, some challenging

The State Bar has proposed two ethics opinions, one on colleague impairment and another on potential client obligations.

Jessica Beckwith

Partner
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Email: jessica.beckwith@lewisbrisbois.com

Jessica practices in the firm's Los Angeles and Phoenix offices. Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Beckwith worked at the State Bar of California, Office of Chief Trial Counsel, as both deputy and senior trial counsel. Ms. Beckwith represents attorneys in disciplinary matters and advises attorneys and law firms on matters relating to State Bar complaints in California and Arizona as well as fee disputes, disciplinary matters, disqualification issues, bar admissions, and other licensing, ethics, and professional responsibility issues.

See more...

Brian Slome

Partner
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Email: bslome@lbbslaw.com

Brian's practice focuses on the defense of professionals, which includes defending attorneys in legal malpractice and discipline proceedings.

See more...

California’s State Bar’s Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct intends to issue two advisory opinions addressing challenges common to lawyers working in law firms, and illuminated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Proposed Opinion 14-0001 explores the ethical obligations both supervisory and subordinate lawyers have when dealing with colleague impairment. COPRAC interprets California’s Rules of Professional Conduct t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up