This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Technology,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility,
Civil Litigation,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.

Mar. 5, 2021

‘Mad dash on the internet’ saves attorney from sanctions in Apple suit

Plaintiffs’ lawyer Benjamin Siegel did not technically violate the protective order, wrote U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson. “And it’s not like this information was just a little bit public: Apple’s own CEO had already announced it to the halls of Congress.”

'Mad dash on the internet' saves attorney from sanctions in Apple suit

A plaintiffs' attorney in a class action against Apple alleging it has a monopoly in the distribution of apps was able to save himself from being sanctioned by finding that the information he was accused of disclosing in violation of a protective order was already revealed in testimony from chief executive Tim Cook.

"At the end...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up