This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Apr. 7, 2021

9th Circuit tailors definition of a class

The federal appeals court said it would not establish a bright line rule for how to determine whether “substantially all” members of a potential class suffer the same harms but that the percentage of a group’s members who aren’t suffering the same harms as the others must be minimal.

In order to certify a group of plaintiffs as a class, courts must confirm that "substantially all" the potential class members share common legal issues, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.

The opinion concerned a high profile antitrust case in which three U.S. producers of packaged tuna that have since been subject to criminal charges -- Starkist, Chicken of the Sea, and Bumble Bee Foods -- were accused of a price f...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up