Technology,
Labor/Employment,
Civil Litigation
Apr. 13, 2021
US judge reverses himself: Proposition 22 retroactivity is undecided
U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen in San Francisco initially said in January Proposition 22 was not retroactive when he certified a class of Uber drivers, who said the company misclassified them as independent contractors.
The question of whether Proposition 22 is retroactive is still up for debate, a federal judge has clarified months after stating the gig-driver law does not apply retroactively.
U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen in San Francisco initially said in January Proposition 22 was not retroactive when he certified a class of Uber drivers who said the company misclassified th...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Technology, Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation
State labor chief says Uber drivers deal was reverse auction
By Jessica Mach
Technology, Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation
Labor Commissioner objects to deal between Uber and class of drivers
Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal
4th District considers whether California’s gig worker law applies to Instacart
By Jessica Mach
Labor/Employment, California Supreme Court
State high court won’t hear unions challenge to Proposition 22
By Jessica Mach