This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

May 24, 2021

Panel hears arguments on definition of ‘budget bill’

“If the court is persuaded to allow the Legislature to, at any time after the enactment of the budget, enact a budget junior bill that has some amendment to the budget … then we’ve opened up a situation in which the Legislature can essentially enact substantive law on a majority vote and have it go into effect immediately,” Thomas W. Hiltachk of Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk LLP argued.

To decide whether the Legislature abused the budget process in 2017 to defend Sen. Josh Newman from a recall campaign, a panel of 3rd District Court of Appeal justices spent considerable time questioning an attorney for the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association" in a Friday hearing.

The hearing took on two consolidated cases in which, according to the docket, the court must decide, "Does the Legislature ... have authority to amend the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up