This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Government,
Civil Litigation

Jun. 10, 2021

Pot businesses challenges Sacramento fee based on alleged harm

After California voters legalized recreational use of pot with Proposition 64 in 2016, the city imposed a 1% fee on the gross receipts of cannabis businesses and authorized a study of whether these businesses caused an adverse impact.

A cannabis business has challenged a Sacramento municipal fee, claiming the city has not gone through the proper steps to show these businesses cause harm that needs mitigation.

"The nexus study the city commissioned doesn't show the impacts that the city is purporting are necessary in order to justify the fee," said John R. Garner, an attorney with Garner & Associates LLP in Willows who filed the complaint. "Despite being aware...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up