Labor/Employment,
Civil Rights,
Civil Litigation
Jun. 11, 2021
Lawyers and judge mull how to allege Uber’s rating system is racist
The proposed class action was dismissed once for being “sparse and poorly drafted”
A lawsuit that a federal judge recently dismissed for being too "sparse and poorly drafted" came under review again Thursday, when attorneys argued over what information the plaintiff needed to prove that Uber's ratings tool is discriminatory.
The proposed class action was filed by noted Uber foe Shannon Liss-Riordan of Lichten & Liss-Riordan PC, who alleged the ride-share company racially discriminated against minority drivers...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
