This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Jul. 23, 2021

The irrelevance of the relevance objection in arbitration

I’m often asked: When examining witnesses, my opponents like to ask questions that have nothing to do with the case. Why don’t arbitrators sustain my relevance objections?

Christopher David Ruiz Cameron

Justice Marshall F. McComb Professor of Law
Southwestern Law School

See more...

ASK THE ARBITRATOR

In training sessions held in California, Nevada and sometimes Washington state, I teach lawyers and non-lawyers how to be more effective advocates in arbitration. I often get asked variations on this question:

Q. When examining witnesses, my opponents like to ask questions that have nothing to do with the case. Why don't arbitrators sustain my relevance objections?

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up