This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law

Sep. 8, 2021

Outsourcing the violation of constitutional rights to private parties

Texas’ new abortion law gives enforcement powers to private citizens. Is there precedent for that?

Marc D. Alexander

Attorney and Mediator
Alternative Resolution Centers (ARC)

Email: alexanderdisputeresolution@gmail.com

See more...

Last week, media commentary on the abortion rights case, Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, 21A24, circled around a host of issues: the U.S. Supreme Court's use of the shadow docket to punt on having to decide a Constitutional question, the jiggery-pokery explanation by the unsigned court majority for refusing to hear the request for provisional relief, the dissent by Chief Justice John Roberts, the so-called "institutionalist" on the court,...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up