This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Judges and Judiciary,
Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Oct. 11, 2021

Draft ethics opinion sets rules for judges’ feedback to lawyers

“When you read the whole thing, or even a summary, the list of things that the judges should not do is so long and so comprehensive that I have to wonder whether any judge would actually want to engage in the practice of providing this feedback, given all the things he or she would have to avoid,” Arthur Hellman, professor emeritus at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.

The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions received lukewarm reactions Friday to its request for comment on its drafted advisory opinion cautioning judges about giving lawyers feedback on their courtroom performance.

In the draft, the committee stated the Code of Judicial Ethics does not bar judges from providing such feedback when lawyers or their supervisors request it. However, judges must be aware of several cano...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up