Technology,
Law Practice,
Ediscovery
Nov. 5, 2021
TAR can be a sticky situation when not adequately addressed in an ESI protocol
Most litigated matters involve reviewing electronically stored information that amounts to the digital equivalent of not just bankers’ boxes full of documents, but documents that, if produced in hard copy, would fill several warehouses. Hence, the need for technology-assisted review.
Daniel B. Garrie
Neutral
JAMS
Cyber Security
Orange County
Cell: (212) 826-5351
Email: daniel@lawandforensics.com
Gail A. Andler
Neutral
JAMS
Email: gandler@jamsadr.com
Gail A. Andler is a retired judge of the Orange County Superior Court. She is a Southern California-based neutral who specializes in business, employment, class actions, and mass torts.
Most litigated matters involve reviewing electronically stored information that amounts to the digital equivalent of not just bankers’ boxes full of documents, but documents that, if produced in hard copy, would fill several warehouses. From a cost and efficiency perspective, lawyers must consider using technology-assisted review, or TAR, to expedite the review and controls costs. TAR is not appropriate in every scenario, but it can lower costs and expedite review in ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In