Technology,
Law Practice,
California Supreme Court
Nov. 10, 2021
LA court told to explain halt to public remote access
The order appears to set up a clash between the Supreme Court and the Legislature on one side, pushing for continued use of remote proceedings even as courts return to in-person proceedings, and judges on the other side who have mixed feelings about video proceedings ever since courtroom cameras turned O.J. Simpson’s murder trial into an international spectacle.
The California Supreme Court gave Los Angeles County Superior Court until next week to explain why it won't restore the public's remote access to proceedings.
The order appears to set up a clash between the Supreme Court and the Legislature on one side, pushing for continued use of remote proceedings even as courts return to in-person proceedings, and judges on the other side who have mixed feelings about video proceedings ever since courtr...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Technology, California Supreme Court
Livestream leads to ‘leaked recordings, chilled expression’
By Blaise Scemama
Law Practice, Constitutional Law
Media outlets object to LA court’s reason for editing remote program
By Skyler Romero
Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports
LA court wrong to claim copyright of Britney Spears’ testimony, experts say
By Blaise Scemama
Judges and Judiciary, Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation
Britney Spears hearing crashes LA Court listening system
By Blaise Scemama
