This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government,
Constitutional Law,
Administrative/Regulatory

Nov. 11, 2021

State lawmakers mull costs, benefits of social media control

An informational hearing of the state Senate Judiciary Committee focused on the influence of the First Amendment and Section 230 of the U.S. Communications Decency Act on efforts to hold social media companies accountable for offensive, misleading or harmful content posted on their platforms.

The state Senate Judiciary Committee heard this week from law professors and industry representatives favoring and opposing government regulation of social media, with topics ranging from the cost of such measures to calls for stricter transparency mandates.

“The issues we look to tackle and better understand today have been around for some time and have grown exponentially over the last few years,” the committee chair, Sen. Tom J. Umberg,...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up