Civil Litigation,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Nov. 11, 2021
No stay for Apple to end rules against bypassing its commissions
U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers decided that staying her injunction would primarily benefit Apple to the detriment of developers and iPhone users. She wrote, “Consumer information, transparency, and consumer choice is in the interest of the public.”
A federal judge refused to suspend an order requiring Apple to end anticompetitive rules that prohibit developers from directing users to avenues that allow apps to bypass a commission on sales.
U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers decided Tuesday that staying her injunction would primarily benefit Apple to the detriment of developers and iPhone users. She wrote, "Cons...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Preliminary OK for $100M Apple deal with developers
By Winston Cho
Technology, Civil Litigation
Judge unlikely to stay order limiting Apple’s sales commission
By Winston Cho
Technology, Civil Litigation, Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Apple’s $100M deal with developers gets preliminary OK
By Winston Cho
Technology, Civil Litigation, Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Apple seeks to appeal order hitting its core App Store business
By Winston Cho
Technology, Civil Litigation, Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Apple not monopolistic but some rules illegal, judge rules
By Winston Cho
Technology, Civil Litigation, Antitrust & Trade Reg.
$100M Apple settlement clears some restrictions on app makers
By Winston Cho