Technology,
California Supreme Court
Nov. 22, 2021
Livestream leads to ‘leaked recordings, chilled expression’
“It would mean that courts cannot draw distinctions between courtroom spectators and participants — every spectator now has the constitutional right to sit alongside the judge,” wrote Robert A. Naeve of Jones Day.
Allowing the public to livestream court proceedings will lead to leaked recordings, chilled courtroom expression, and impede witness testimony, the Los Angeles County Superior Court told the state Supreme Court Friday in response to a petition to restore remote access.
In October, USA Today asked the state Supreme Court to grant review of its petition asking the LA court to restore the remote access program it created during the pandemic. T...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Law Practice, Constitutional Law
Media outlets object to LA court’s reason for editing remote program
By Skyler Romero
Technology, Law Practice, California Supreme Court
LA court told to explain halt to public remote access
By Blaise Scemama
Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports
LA court wrong to claim copyright of Britney Spears’ testimony, experts say
By Blaise Scemama
Judges and Judiciary, Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation
Britney Spears hearing crashes LA Court listening system
By Blaise Scemama