Law Practice,
Constitutional Law
Dec. 1, 2021
Media outlets object to LA court’s reason for editing remote program
“We have this outpouring of support from news publishers, journalists and First Amendment scholars who have come out in force to say how important this is,” Christopher C. Melcher, the Woodland Hills attorney representing USA Today, said.
Media entities across the U.S. have filed legal objections to the Los Angeles County Superior Court's explanation of its decision to end its remote audio attendance program.
In two amici curiae letters and one reply brief filed on Monday, outlets including the The Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, and USA Today contested the court's reasoning and continued calls to reinstate the program, which would allow media and public entities ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Technology, California Supreme Court
Livestream leads to ‘leaked recordings, chilled expression’
By Blaise Scemama
Technology, Law Practice, California Supreme Court
LA court told to explain halt to public remote access
By Blaise Scemama
Intellectual Property, Entertainment & Sports
LA court wrong to claim copyright of Britney Spears’ testimony, experts say
By Blaise Scemama
Judges and Judiciary, Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation
Britney Spears hearing crashes LA Court listening system
By Blaise Scemama
