The law required corporations to have at least one female director on their boards by the end of 2019. By the end of this year it required boards of six or more to have at least three female directors, and for boards of four or fewer to have at least one female director.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis (Daily Journal photo)

LOS ANGELES -- Judicial Watch attorneys called their first plaintiff witnesses Wednesday in their lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a California law requiring a minimum number of women on corporate boards by the end of the year.

The plaintiffs testified in the Los Angeles County Superior Court bench trial to their status as taxpayers in the case challenging Senate Bill 826 on grounds the expenditure of public funds to enforce a ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

Corporate, Civil Litigation

Dec. 2, 2021

Judicial Watch opens case on legality of corporate board quotas

Related Content

Corporate, Civil Litigation

Corporate, Civil Litigation

Corporate, Civil Litigation

Corporate, Civil Litigation

Labor/Employment, Corporate

Corporate, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights

Letters, Corporate

Corporate, Civil Rights

Corporate, Constitutional Law, Civil Litigation

Labor/Employment, Corporate, Civil Litigation

Corporate, Civil Litigation

Corporate,

Civil Litigation