Criminal,
Civil Rights,
Civil Litigation
Feb. 2, 2022
Judge to decide if SF police unlawfully used surveillance
In a motion for summary judgment, Deputy City Attorney Wayne K. Snodgrass argued the plaintiffs’ argument is based on a more restrictive and “imaginary” version of the city’s surveillance technology legislation.
Civil rights activists and the city of San Francisco both asked a judge Tuesday to issue summary judgment in their favor in a lawsuit that alleges the police unlawfully used surveillance technology during protests over George Floyd's death in 2020.
"During those protests, the SFPD violated a city law, the Surveillance Technology Ordinance, by acquiring and using a network of over 300 cameras to monitor the protests," Mukund Rathi, an attor...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
