This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Law Practice,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Feb. 25, 2022

No there there? Avoiding nonobjections in arbitration

A pet peeve of many arbitrators, including me, is the tendency of some advocates to deal with evidence they don’t like by raising imaginary or commonly misunderstood objections.

Christopher David Ruiz Cameron

Justice Marshall F. McComb Professor of Law
Southwestern Law School

See more...

ASK THE ARBITRATOR

A pet peeve of many arbitrators, including me, is the tendency of some advocates to deal with evidence they don't like by raising imaginary or commonly misunderstood objections.

Let's call these "nonobjections."

A typical nonobjection goes something like this: "Objection. I don't understand the question" -- hardly a recognized ground for challenging a question.

$95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up