This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Jun. 29, 2022

The growing divide over unmanageable PAGA claims

See more on The growing divide over unmanageable PAGA claims

Felix Shafir

Partner, Horvitz & Levy LLP

Appellate Law

Email: fshafir@horvitzlevy.com

Felix's practice focuses on the defense of class and representative actions.

Jeremy Rosen

California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) permits an “aggrieved employee” to “bring a civil action personally and on behalf of other current or former employees to recover civil penalties for Labor Code violations.” Arias v. Superior Ct., 209 P.3d 923, 930 (Cal. 2009).

The California Supreme Court, however, has held that, despite their representative nature, PAGA claims are “different from a class action.” Kim v. Reins Int’l Cal., ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails