The Antitrust Division at the DOJ has historically received wide deference from courts in criminal prosecutions. The clearest example of this is the per se rule, which is among the strongest tools in all of criminal law. However, recent efforts by the DOJ to bring novel prosecutions run the risk of stretching the per se presumption beyond its limit. In this year alone, a district court concerned about application of the per se rule to a novel no-poach prosecution requ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In