This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Nov. 16, 2022

ANTITRUST LOSSES RISK UNDERMINING PER SE RULE

Heather Nyong'o

Partner, Cleary Gottlieb

Joseph Kay

Associate Attorney, Cleary Gottlieb

The Antitrust Division at the DOJ has historically received wide deference from courts in criminal prosecutions. The clearest example of this is the per se rule, which is among the strongest tools in all of criminal law. However, recent efforts by the DOJ to bring novel prosecutions run the risk of stretching the per se presumption beyond its limit. In this year alone, a district court concerned about application of the per se rule to a novel no-poach prosecution requ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails