This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
Intellectual Property

May 24, 2023

Supreme Court in Warhol case resets significance of “transformative” issue in fair use analysis

Despite the concerns articulated in the dissent, the Court’s decision is far from a death knell for transformative uses of existing works. Instead, the decision rebalances the analysis by focusing on the manner in which a new work is used, and by clarifying that the degree to which a new use is transformative is relevant to, but not dispositive of, the fair use inquiry.

Rollin A. Ransom

Managing Partner
Sidley Austin LLP

Phone: (213) 896-6000

Email: rransom@sidley.com

See more...

Lauren M. De Lilly

Partner
Sidley Austin LLP

Phone: (213) 896-6085

Email: ldelilly@sidley.com

See more...

In its recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken the opportunity to again address the fair use defense to copyright infringement. Since the Court’s decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 575 (1994), the question of whether an allegedly infringing work is transformative – $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up