This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 22, 2023

Contract employee screeners can be liable for queries

The state Supreme Court ruling, if adopted by a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel that asked the question, would revive a class action by two plaintiffs against an occupational health provider that screens prospective employees

Companies hired by employers to screen job applicants for medical conditions can be held liable if they ask inappropriate questions under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act law, the state Supreme Court ruled Monday.

The ruling, if adopted by a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel that asked the certified question of the state court, would revive a class action by two plaintiffs against Select Medical Holdings Inc., an occupatio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up