Litigation & Arbitration
Aug. 25, 2023
Witness: Eastman’s views ‘extraordinary and radical’
John C. Eastman’s attorney, Randall A. Miller, objected to expert witness testimony by a Stanford Law School professor, on the grounds that he helped oversee the drafting of the disciplinary charges.
Former Fowler School of Law dean John C. Eastman’s legal theory that a vice president has the authority to decide whether to count electoral presidential votes was “extraordinary and radical,” a State Bar witness stated Thursday at the resumption of proceedings that could lead to Eastman’s disbarment.
“The Electoral Count Act of 1887 says that Congress, pursuant to these specific procedures, has the sole authority to count electoral votes ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In