Constitutional Law
Sep. 13, 2023
Prop. 22 violates state constitution, app drivers say
In an opening merits brief filed Monday, Scott A. Kronland of Altshuler Berzon LLP argued that the initiative’s corporate backers erred by proposing an initiative statute instead of a constitutional amendment.
Lawyers for some Lyft, Uber and DoorDash drivers told the California Supreme Court that a voter initiative that allowed certain app workers to be classified as independent contractors violates the state Constitution in its entirety.
In an opening merits brief filed Monday, Scott A. Kronland of Altshuler Berzon LLP argued that the initiative’s corporate backers erred by proposing an initiative statute instead of a constitutional amendment.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In