9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Oct. 5, 2023
9th Circuit considers if arbitration clause bars PAGA participation
Judges on the 9th Circuit panel did not appear eager Wednesday to embrace the argument that Adolph v. Uber Technologies Inc. is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
A California Supreme Court ruling that allowed workers whose claims are referred to arbitration to pursue them in court on behalf of their colleagues violates the Federal Arbitration Act, an attorney told a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel Wednesday.
Judges on the panel seemed skeptical of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP partner Jason C. Schwartz’s argument on behalf of Lowe’s Home Centers LLC. Schwartz told the court that a federal ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In