This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

Oct. 19, 2023

Au pairs must arbitrate PAGA claims, companies say

The au pair plaintiffs argued that the suit cannot be sent to arbitration because the contracts require disputes be handled in the “arbitrational tribunals of Switzerland” which they claim do not exist.

Two in-home care companies asked a San Francisco judge on Wednesday to compel arbitration of a Private Attorneys General Act lawsuit filed by a group of au pairs who claim the company paid them less than $10,000 per year despite working full time.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs — Peter Rukin of Rukin Hyland & Riggin LLP, Matthew C. Helland of Nichols Kaster LLP, and Alexander Hood of Towards Justice — argued that their lawsuit, accusing ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up