A California Court of Appeal has upheld a judgment enforcing the payment of a lawyer by his former client, also an attorney, dismissing the appellant's argument that the arbitrator who oversaw the dispute failed to disclose that he regularly represents lawyers.
The case, heard by the 2nd District Court of Appeal, involved Jordan S. Esensten's challenge of a trial court's judgment confirming an arbitration award of $72,900.58 entered in fav...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In