This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Rights

Feb. 29, 2024

Hoodies, racial stereotypes, and the California Racial Injustice Act

A state appeals court recently instructed a San Diego trial judge to rehear the basis of a traffic stop, and to consider the possibility of implicit bias based on what the officer knew before he stopped the car.

K. Chike Odiwe

Attorney, Burris Nisenbaum Curry & Lacy

Civil Rights

Shutterstock

A unanimous three-judge panel of the 4th District Court of Appeal (Appellate Court) found that San Diego Superior Court Judge Howard Shore (Judge Shore) failed to account for evidence that the traffic stop of a Black man may have been the result of implicit bias with a potential remedy under the California Racial Justice Act (RJA).

The Appellate Court remanded the case to Judge Shore and instructed him to rehear defendant Tommy Bonds’ (Bon...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)