Consumer Protection Law
Mar. 5, 2024
Supreme Court rules for consumer in lemon law case
The dispute concerned how much money FCA US LLC, known historically as Chrysler, should have to pay Lisa Niedermeier in damages for breach of express and implied warranty under the law because the manufacturer refused to take the vehicle back.
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/linkedin.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/twitter.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/threads.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/facebook.png)
A car manufacturer does not get to subtract from damages a trade-in credit that a consumer took when purchasing another vehicle after it refused to accept the return of her defective Jeep, the state Supreme Court ruled Monday.
The case concerned how to apply the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commonly known as California’s lemon law.
The dispute concerned how much money FCA US LLC, known historically as C...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In