U.S. Supreme Court,
Labor/Employment
Mar. 7, 2024
Employers face increased risk of SOX retaliation claims with Supreme Court's Murray ruling
Employers should anticipate more whistleblower tips, create a culture of compliance, establish a centralized tip reporting system, conduct prompt and fair investigations, maintain communication with whistleblowers, and document employee performance.
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/linkedin.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/twitter.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/threads.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/facebook.png)
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/people/avatars/000/227/239/original/Hoffman_Brian_gallery.jpg?1698107928)
Brian Neil Hoffman
Partner, Holland & Hart LLP
![](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/dailyjournal-prod/articles/images/000/377/516/original/shutterstock_1974815864.jpg?1709779747)
Employers that improperly retaliate against employees because of their whistleblowing may be subject to claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). A SOX retaliation case before the U.S. Supreme Court, Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, et al., held the potential for refinements to the preexisting framework applied in these cases - requiring additional proof from plaintiffs. Yet earlier this month in that case, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimousl...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In