U.S. Supreme Court,
Civil Litigation,
Administrative/Regulatory
Jul. 12, 2024
Supreme Court ruling could alter established regulatory landscape
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the statute of limitations for challenging an administrative regulation begins when the plaintiff is injured, rather than when the regulation is adopted. This decision, which applies to federal agencies, could have downstream effects on state regulations, potentially leading to increased challenges to final agency actions.
Brett W. Johnson
Partner, Snell & Wilmer LLP
Ryan P. Hogan
Associate, Snell & Wilmer LLP
Charlene A. Warner
Associate, Snell & Wilmer LLP
Among the flurry of high-profile administrative law cases resolved by the United States Supreme Court over the last several weeks, it would have been easy to miss what could become one of this term’s most significant. Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System posed a simple question: for purposes of determining when a cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations, does the clock for bringing a facial ch...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In