This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Jul. 24, 2024

Justice Clarence Thomas' skepticism challenges associational standing doctrine

The concept, which dates back to 1958, has been used by conservative groups to challenge affirmative action policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.

The New York Times

When out-of-state business groups sue in federal court to block California laws they don't like, they often cite the decades-old doctrine of associational standing. But that doctrine could be on its way out if a small group of conservative-leaning scholars get their way.

Associational standing allows an association to sue on behalf of injured members, even if only some of them suffered an injury. For instance, Michael Buschbacher, a partner with Boyden Gray PLLC in Washington...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails