This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Torts/Personal Injury,
California Supreme Court,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 23, 2024

California Supreme Court clarifies exemption of tort claims from economic loss rule

The court's previous decision in Robinson Helicopter v. Dana Corp. left unanswered the question of whether fraudulent concealment claims could be exempted from the rule.

The state Supreme Court has answered a certified question from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, clarifying the application of the state's economic loss rule to claims of fraudulent concealment arising from conduct during a contractual relationship.

The court ruled that such claims can be exempt from the rule, pending a plaintiff's ability to establish it independently of any contractual rights and responsibility and prove any risk of harm is more than purely economic...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails