This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Sep. 5, 2024

Panel: State can't make social media disclose content moderation policies

The law, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2022, required companies with more than $100 million in gross annual revenues to file regular reports with the state about how they moderate topics such as hate speech, racism, extremism and foreign political influence.

Citing First Amendment violations, a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Wednesday enjoined a California law requiring social media companies to disclose their content moderation policies.

The decision was a victory for X Corp., formerly known as Twitter, which challenged the law in 2023.

Reversing a decision by Senior U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb of Sacramento, 9th Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith ruled that AB 587's content category report provisions &qu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails