Torts/Personal Injury
Sep. 10, 2024
Ring, ring, ring... The latest update to NIED is here
The California Supreme Court has broadened negligent infliction of emotional distress claims to include plaintiffs who were not physically present at the injury scene. This expansion could lead to more NIED claims.
Jonathan Davidi
Attorney Panish, Shea, Boyle & Ravipudi LLP
The California Supreme Court recently clarified the scope and extent of a plaintiff's ability to claim negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) as a bystander. Pursuant to the holding in Downey v. City of Riverside (2024) __ Cal.5th __, a bystander plaintiff does not need to know that their relative's injury was caused by the negligence of the defendant in order to recover damages for NIED.
Since the Supreme Court's seminal 1968 ruling in Dillon v...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In