This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental & Energy,
Consumer Law,
Business Law

Oct. 8, 2024

SF judge skeptical of oil majors' jurisdiction arguments

San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Ethan P. Schulman said that arguments in favor of defendants' motion to quash claims brought by the state and several local governments didn't "square with common sense."

A San Francisco judge on Monday pushed back on the argument that 14 out-of-state oil companies, accused of misleading the public about an alleged fossil fuel industry impact on climate change, could not be subjected to the personal jurisdiction of a California court for "claims premised on conduct all over the world."

Dawn Sestito of O'Melveny & Myers LLP, one of Exxon Mobil Corp.'s lead attorneys who argued for the defendants' joint motion to quash, said...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails