This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Oct. 18, 2024

Trying to make sense of the bar exam debate

The California Supreme Court has rejected a proposal for a Practical Bar Exam (PBE) as a method of licensure, citing procedural and substantive issues. The court's decision has raised questions about the timing and content of the order, and the need for further guidance to ensure a robust and responsive legal profession.

Claire M. Solot

Co-founder, Legal Services Funders Network

Shutterstock

In October 2020, to reassess attorney licensure, the California Supreme Court established a Blue Ribbon Commission (BRC) on the Future of the California Bar Exam. Since then, I have attended meetings, reviewed proposals, and documented efforts to explore new methods for licensure. Licensure reform is not new, California's first licensure statute in 1851 required candidates to present evidence of moral character and complete a rigorous examination in...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails