This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Immigration

Oct. 18, 2024

Ninth Circuit's asylum ruling hits a different note

The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled in Singh v. Garland that the government cannot arbitrarily rely on affidavits from other asylum seekers with similar claims to negate the credibility of an individual asylum seeker. The ruling highlights the complexities of asylum claims and the need for nuanced and individualized assessments.

Avantika Shastri

Senior Attorney, Van Der Hout, LLP

Christine Raymond

Attorney, Van Der Hout, LLP

Shutterstock

On Oct. 4, 2024, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit delivered a ruling in Singh v. Garland, _ F. 4th _, Case no. 23-95, 2024 WL 4401941 (2024), which has significant implications for the way asylum claims are litigated and assessed.  The court limited the ability of the government to submit, and immigration judges to consider, affidavits from other asylum applicants with similar claims when evalua...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails