This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letters

Nov. 5, 2024

Misleading claims about Prop 36's immigration consequences

Even if immigrants complete treatment under Prop. 36, they will still face immigration consequences.

Raha Jorjani

Deputy Public Defender Managing, Immigration Representation Unit of the Alameda County Public Defender's Office

Jorjani is a former professor at UC Davis School of Law and has practiced immigration law for over 19 years.

I want to address Greg Totten's (Co-chair of Yes on Prop 36 and CEO of the California District Attorneys Association) comments about Proposition 36 and its immigration consequences, as I believe they mislead the public.

First, he claims that if someone completes treatment under Proposition 36, their charges will be dismissed so they will not suffer any immigration consequences. This is false. Even if an immigrant completes treatment under Prop. 36 and their plea to the offense ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails