When sections of the Santa Cruz Wharf fell into the sea just before Christmas, people quickly began pointing fingers at plaintiffs they believe misused California's most famous environmental law. But the group's attorney has rejected these claims.
"Perhaps if there hadn't been such unnecessary delay from frivolous lawsuits, we would still have the original wharf," read one of the more polite reader comments in a local entertainment paper called Good Times. ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In