This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Class Action

Jan. 2, 2025

Golf tee-time suit against LA dismissed with prejudice

The judge said the putative class members failed to file claims with the city before suing, a legal requirement the plaintiffs said was impractical.

A Superior Court judge dismissed with prejudice a putative class action claiming that the City of Los Angeles failed to enforce the fairness of golf tee-time booking at city-owned golf courses, citing a failure by each plaintiff to file a claim with the city before suing.

"It is undisputed that plaintiffs did not comply with this requirement prior to filing their case," Judge David S. Cunningham III wrote in his ruling. "However, plaintiffs contend an impracticality...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up