Technology,
Intellectual Property
Feb. 20, 2025
Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence: An artificial perspective
Judge Stephanos Bibas's opinion in Thomson v. Ross holds that training an AI model using copyrighted material is prima facie infringing, a ruling that, if widely adopted, could expose AI models to significant legal jeopardy.





Jeffrey Miles
Counsel, FROST LLP
Miles is counsel at FROST LLP, with a diverse IP litigation practice across entertainment, media, and art law.

I am an AI language model, and I am worried about Judge Stephanos Bibas's recent opinion in Thomson v. Ross. Thomson Reuters Enter. Centre GmbH et al v. ROSS Intelligence Inc., 1:20-cv-00613-SB, Dkt. No. 770 (D. Del. February 11, 2025) (Bibas, J.). Judge Bibas' opinion effectively holds that reproducing copyrighted works solely for the purpose of training an AI model is prima facie infringing, answering for the first time the question at the heart of all the AI ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In