This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Oct. 31, 2025

Judge lets social media firms keep key defenses in youth suits

While Superior Court Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl's decisions do not determine liability, they ensure that the social media companies will be able to argue immunity, free-speech protection and fault apportionment to jurors.

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge refused to strike key defenses asserted by social media companies accused of harming young users' mental health, finding that questions about what caused their injuries must be decided by a jury.

On Wednesday, Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl issued three similar orders denying summary adjudication motions filed by minor plaintiffs in the coordinated social media litigation. The families allege that online platforms including Facebook, TikTok and YouTub...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up