Shutterstock
Liability insurers have for several years employed "catch-all" language to broaden the scope of Intellectual Property and Habitability exclusions. These exclusions purport to eliminate coverage for an entire lawsuit that alleges an intellectual property infringement or habitability violation - even if the lawsuit also alleges other explicitly covered claims.
While California courts have generally enforced these exclusions as unambiguous, no court has ye...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




