This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Mar. 6, 2026

Facts, not findings: What practitioners get wrong about stipulations under Family Code § 3044

Stipulations can streamline custody cases, even in domestic violence matters. But as the Court of Appeal reminds us, in Section 3044 cases parties may stipulate to facts--never to findings.

Jackson Lucky

Arbitrator, mediator and private judge
JAMS

Employment, medical malpractice, personal injury, probate, commercial, family law

See more...

Facts, not findings: What practitioners get wrong about stipulations under Family Code § 3044
Shutterstock

Family law practitioners use stipulations to streamline custody proceedings. When both parents agree--even in domestic violence cases--the instinct is to write it up, hand it to the court and move on. That instinct is understandable. Dockets are overburdened. Litigation is expensive. A stipulation on custody seems to serve everyone.

$95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up