This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation & Arbitration

Dec. 16, 2024

Burden lifted in arbitration waiver cases

The California Supreme Court's decision in Quach v. California Commerce Club (2024) eliminated the decades-old arbitration-specific burden requiring proof of prejudice for waiver, aligning arbitration agreements with standard contract principles and placing the focus solely on whether the party seeking to compel arbitration knowingly and intentionally relinquished their right.

Shutterstock

For decades, civil litigants in California courts confronted motions to compel arbitration filed months, sometimes years after litigation had commenced, discovery was well underway, motions were heard, and more. Often, despite the time and expense of litigating incurred, such motions were granted. They were granted based on a legal fiction: a supposed policy favoring arbitration over litigation which gave rise to a judicially created arbitration-specific burden falling...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails